![]() ![]() If this orientation is used consistently, the focus for predictive value is on what is going on within each row in the 2 x 2 table, as you will see below. The illustrations used earlier for sensitivity and specificity emphasized a focus on the numbers in the left column for sensitivity and the right column for specificity. ![]() If the test was positive, the patient will want to know the probability that they really have the disease, i.e., how worried should they be?Ĭonversely, if it is good news, and the screening test was negative, how reassured should the patient be? What is the probability that they are disease free?Īnother way that helps me keep this straight is to always orient my contingency table with the gold standard at the top and the true disease status listed in the columns. One way to avoid confusing this with sensitivity and specificity is to imagine that you are a patient and you have just received the results of your screening test (or imagine you are the physician telling a patient about their screening test results. ![]() Negative predictive value is the probability that subjects with a negative screening test truly don't have the disease.Positive predictive value is the probability that subjects with a positive screening test truly have the disease.These are also computed from the same 2 x 2 contingency table, but the perspective is entirely different. When evaluating the feasibility or the success of a screening program, one should also consider the positive and negative predictive values. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |